Social Heterogeneity and Wasteful Lobbying
نویسندگان
چکیده
Using a general equilibrium model with endogenous policy, we explore how heterogeneity affects wasteful lobbying by sectoral interest groups. With the help of a simulation approach, we first investigate the impact of information heterogeneity on how lobbies react to a shift from a soft to a strict government budget constraint. Next, we examine how lobbying is influenced by heterogenous perception of the general equilibrium implications of lobbying effort. Finally, we explore the consequences of heterogenous specialization in households’ asset portfolios. We conclude that social heterogeneity in information, perceptions, and portfolio compositions increases incentives to lobby. _ _____________ † Stanford University; †† University of California at Berkeley. Correspondence should be sent to: Marcel Fafchamps, Department of Economics, Stanford, CA 94305. Heterogeneity and Wasteful Lobbying 1. Heterogeneity as a Source of Wasteful Lobbying Thanks to the important contributions of the public choice school, economists and political scientists have long recognized that lobbying activities can be an important source of resource wastage (e.g., Tullock, 1980; Krueger, 1974; Bhagwati, 1982). This happens not only through the policy distortions which lobbying may induce, but also through the wastage of resources which are rationally expended in lobbying activities by special interest groups. In recent years, considerable attention has been given to the role of heterogeneity of incomes or endowments in collective action (e.g., Quiggin, 1993; Johnson and Libecap, 1982). In that literature, heterogeneity has been analyzed in terms of the role which intra-group differences play on the ability of a group to cooperate, generally finding that some forms of heterogeneity are detrimental to successful cooperation (e.g., Baland and Platteau, 1996). Here, we focus instead on aspects of heterogeneity across groups which may induce particular groups to modify their lobbying behavior. Interest in inter-group heterogeneity is in part motivated by widespread political liberalization which has removed the lid on internal conflicts of influence over the state. In highly heterogenous societies, like those in the Balkans, Eastern Europe, and Africa, such conflicts have frequently unleashed intense wars of influence over state policy. One factor that seems to have played an important role in the success of economic and political reforms is the degree of inter-group heterogeneity characterizing the communities that have acquired greater control over local governments in the wake of political liberalization.
منابع مشابه
Centralized provision of public goods: static vs dynamic performance in the presence of political pressure, lobbying and heterogeneity of tastes
This paper analyses the efficiency of centralized public goods provision in a model of incomplete contracts. Politicians determine the level of provision through wasteful yet publicly unobservable lobbying efforts. Thereby a threat of dismissal from office caused by regional expectations in terms of reservation utility induces politicians to push for influence of their region’s taste. In a stat...
متن کاملThe Lobbying, Bribery, and Compliance: An Evolutionary Model of Social Factors
Abstract Connecting to rule-makers in order to set favorable rules (lobbying) or paying government executives to bend the current rule (bribing) are the two main strategies for influencing government. This study in an evolutionary game model explain why bribing may become widespread while other states like compliance and cooperative lobbying are Pareto superior. The theoretical model is used ...
متن کاملHabitual and Occasional Lobbyers in the US Steel Industry: An EM Algorithm Pooling Approach
Using firm level data from the U.S. steel industry, we find that lobbying for import protection is habit forming. Controlling for firm performance and other factors, past lobbying increases the likelihood of current lobbying in our full sample. Expecting heterogeneity in lobbying behavior among firms, we let an EM algorithm sort our firms into groups with different propensities to lobby. A two-...
متن کاملFiscal federalism and lobbying
Article history: Received 18 April 2005 Received in revised form 20 March 2008 Accepted 7 May 2008 Available online 24 May 2008 Which government functions should be decentralized (resp. centralized) once lobbying behavior is taken into account?We find that the answer largely depends on how the interests of the regional lobbies are positioned with respect to the function to be decentralized (res...
متن کاملStrategic Restraint in Contests
Economic policy is modeled as the outcome of a (political) game between two interest groups. The possible ex-post (realized) outcomes in the game correspond to the proposed policies. In the literature the policies fought for are exogenous. We extend such games by allowing the endogenous determination of the proposed policies. In a first stage the groups decide which policy to lobby for and then...
متن کامل